Today scrolling through Twitter I came across the following tweet.
This was the NAHT debating a motion asking Ofsted to REDUCE emphasis on inspecting governance as part of Leadership and Management. I asked for comments from other governors. Almost all were surprised at this. We couldn’t understand the reasoning behind the motion. There were some light hearted comments such as “Isn’t it lovely that they are concerned about extra pressure on us. They are only looking out for us.” Another comment, in similar vein, was from me. I said that reading this gave me the impression that somewhere a conversation like the one below had taken place which led to the motion.
GB to Head, “Could you include x,y,z in your report, please?”
Head to GB,”Don’t worry about that. I’ve got it under control.”
GB to Head, “No, we really do need it. For one thing it’s our job. For another, we are due an Ofsted and we want to ensure we know our stuff.”
Head to GB, “Ah, Ofsted! Don’t worry about that. We’ll get them not to hold you to account. We’ll tell them you’ve got too much work to do.”
Other governors had also read the Schools Week tweet which led to more discussions. Numerous serious points were made in response to my question and question/comments by others. I’ve summarised discussions from different threads on Twitter and Facebook below.
- This may indicate that heads don’t really understand governance
- The role and responsibility has changed since I’ve been a governor. The workload means it’s like a job now
- There are some heads who get frustrated by their governors and we must acknowledge this. On the other hand there are also heads who try and run the school as their personal fiefdom and try and exclude the GB. We have a duty to be as professional as we can and heads need to understand and respect what governance is and what we do
- Not a straight forward debate. Looking at the framework, it is a part time job
- Collaboration is key
- Power grab?
- We are volunteers which means that if the workload gets too much we can leave. “But I’m a volunteer” should not be used as an excuse
- Unfortunate that those who may have had a poor experience of governance assume it’s typical in every institution
- Are they are considering our health and wellbeing?
- We have gone from “cup of tea, sticky bun and agree with the head” to a very different model. Some governors and heads have kept up and some haven’t
- Getting paid may be a better route than downplaying the role in Ofsted inspections. But if you pay peanuts, you’ll get monkeys!
- Some governing bodies create an unnecessary workload for themselves and do not distribute workload effectively.
- Training of governors is an issue
- Motion was proposed and passed at the conference. The reason for it needs to be heard
- If governance goes wrong then everything will
- Schools need good governance and governance needs to be accountable
- Really disappointed to see this motion
- Governance is essential in any organisation
- My role as chair is far more stressful than my job (I’m saying this tongue-in-cheek)
- If this happened, where is the incentive to fix bad governance? One role of god governance is to hold heads to account. How would that happen?
- Perhaps they don’t want to be held to account
- I feel passionately that strong governance remains
- Personally I would prefer separate judgement for governance
- I don’t agree the governance should be a separate judgement. We are part of leadership and management and this emphasises that
- GBs are accountable in law. Reduce work load by discouraging unneeded hoop jumping? Yes. Make GBs less accountable? Absolutely not!
- Train governors to understand role. That will help in reducing workload
- I can see two sides to this. The possible impact of poor governance on a head and the inability of a head to control good governance
- Ofsted don’t have the expertise to measure governance accurately
- Inspectors shouldn’t be judging without full understanding
- Can have good school leaders let down by poor governance. Opposite also happens
- In some schools senior leaders have little or no contact with governors. Not great for headship preparation
- Many heads do not do governance training and do not understand the role
- In one GB meeting the head brought so many staff that they outnumbered the governors
- Part of the issue is the paucity of governance subject content in many NPQH courses. Starting with a low knowledge base does not help
The debate wasn’t live streamed and the only other tweet I saw was one saying that the motion had been carried. So, we don’t know the context to the motion or how the debate went. Governors would like to know more about what was behind the motion but want to make it clear that we do not wish for reduced accountability or reduced emphasis on governance within the leadership and management judgement. If the motion had called for induction for new governors and CPD we too would have been behind the motion.